Click below for full-size crop embedded in the image. Surprisingly enough, the large focus ring is buttery smooth and its short focus throw makes quick focus acquisition a breeze. Another couple inches of length are added with the hood, but only about an ounce or so of weight. At f/2, expect to start with a +85 amount and 10 midpoint, at f/2.8 a +60 amount and 20 midpoint, at f/4 a +40 amount and 25 midpoint, and any smaller aperture a +30 amount and 30 midpoint. gear1box • … The industry standard geared focus and iris rings share a common position with other Cine DS lenses, eliminating the time it would take to reposition a matte box, follow … The included lens profile for the Rokinon 16mm improves vignetting slightly, but with straight manual corrections you’ll need to fiddle with the adjustment sliders a lot. Wide open, all the lenses, even the Sigma and Rokinon … I recommend always leaving the lens hood on to help prevent as much unwanted reflection as possible. This same lens is also currently sold under the Samyang and Bower brand names. The Rokinon 16mm is no exception, especially being an APS-c lens. Are you also aware that the Tokina has AF whereas the Rokinon is manual focus? For its price, there really isn’t much to complain about. At the moment I have an A6000 with the kit lens (16-50). Second one is that if i went with Rokinon lenses Should i save money and go with old CV series 24 and 35 mm lenses OR the new … Flare and ghosting can occur with either lens, especially when shooting in the direction of bright light sources, but I didn’t find it overly invasive. ( Log Out /  Regarding basic sharpness performance, though, shoot at f/5.6 to guarantee decent … When a subject is within the plane of focus, however, this humble prime produces sharp results. ( Log Out /  ... vs. Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR. For example, if you shoot a model from low to high with the Sigma 16mm, the feet of the model will look much larger than the hands of the model. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/8. Since we had both the Sigma and Sony in for testing at the same time, we decided to put them head-to-head to find out just what the differences are between them! I have a Sigma EX 10-20mm f4-5.6 that I happily use for daytime ultrawide, but it is possible that this new lens would have use in that scenario in lowlight also. Have you ever wanted to get more of the scene in front of you in the frame than your current lens allows, especially if you don't have room to take a few steps back? save hide report. But at this price point? The Sigma lenses are superb. Although they are very similar in build, aperture, look, and feel, they both excel in different aspects of photography and videography. However, the Sigma has a higher magnification (0.10x versus 0.078x). Coming in at a hefty 405 grams, I’d say it’s not a light lens but does it make up for that in terms of quality? Because great photographs don't make themselves. Looking at the examples below, we can see that the Sigma does indeed produce a smoother, more pleasant background blur than the Sony, especially when used wide open. amzn_assoc_linkid = "0d1830809aceb8a8dccff6e1a38a13db"; It can be reversed over the barrel but can be a little difficult to twist off at times. The process of testing a wide-angle lens’ sharpness can be pretty finicky, especially when shooting a resolution chart. we’ll see. I'm more of a vacation/amateur photographer, so i'd only like to make the wide angle lens purchase once. That being said, because the Sony 16mm is one of the only E-mount lenses that isn’t compatible with Sony’s PDAF (phase detection autofocus) system, you may find that focusing is slower than with the Sigma, particularly when shooting moving subjects. The Rokinon 16mm f/2, which I personally reviewed, was another lens that came out in 2013 and in my opinion it was built decently well. If you decide to manually correct it, a +6 correction should get you close enough to the lens profile. The Rokinon 16mm doesn’t provide a very consistent performance as the focus distance changes. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art vs NEW Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens. The Rokinon 16mm doesn’t provide a very consistent performance as the focus distance changes. 83 mm vs 89 mm: 6 mm smaller in diameter: Length: mm vs 90 mm: 90 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 77 mm vs 82 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Reasons to choose Sigma 20mm F1.8 EX DG Aspherical RF over Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Aspherical. Lightroom’s built-in lens profile corrects this distortion quite nicely, however, so I recommend always turning it on for this reason alone. Below is a 100% crop of the same building used in last review’s infinity focus test. Taken as-is, though, it does have its issues that can noticeably affect critical work. Sony 16mm with UWC vs Rokinon/Samyang 12mm? Although it does have some advantages, such as an extremely compact construction and a very affordable price point, I admit that everything else about the lens feels outdated, from the optical quality to its AF motor, which isn’t compatible with Sony’s latest PDAF system. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down … Rokinon 16mm F2.0 High Speed Wide angle The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. To start, here is how we assessed the Pentax 10-17mm Fisheye. Close. Although I am a Technical Engineer and I am constantly explaining to my students how to do technical laboratory tests, I thought that if I was just to submerge readers in technical data, the various brands are there to do that, so I am going to carry out a real comparison between the Irix and the Rokinon (Samyang), or at least I am going to try to. vs. ... Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye. With the same optical formula as in their 16mm f/2.0 AS UMC CS Lens, the 16mm T2.2 is a fast, full-manual-control … 100% Upvoted. Facebook. 4. amzn_assoc_asins = "B077BWD2BB,B0783J5BWP,B003NRHAH8,B01BT79ECC"; Published March 5, 2018 By Heather Filed Under: E-mount lenses Tagged With: lens comparison, Sigma E, Sony E. Our newsletter goes out every week on Sunday. Thankfully Rokinon corrects these pretty well. (I like to do severe storm photography and it often gets very dark under them, even in daylight hours.) By f/4 the aperture starts creating a hard ring around the outside of the highlight and at f/5.6 some annoying artifacts rear their head within most highlights. The sigma is a great lens good quality and from what I have read is very close to the canon 15 2.8 but right now the 8-15L still takes the cake as best IQ and this rokinon is ridiculously close and a wee bit better in the corners. amzn_assoc_ad_mode = "manual"; As always, if you are unfamiliar with my lens review style, check this post first! In fact, at f/11, the results are almost indistinguishable. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Distortions. It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm. The Sigma isn’t the first 16mm lens for Sony APS-C however. Olympus 12mm Vs Samyang 12mm Video Test from Pier-Yves Menkhoff on Vimeo.. Pier Yves sent us the following Olympus 12mm F/2.0 Vs. Rokinon 12mm F/2.0 comparison: Before everything, I would like to thank Hervé Danes for the loan of the Olympus 12mm F/2.0 lens. If size and weight are important to you, one of the first differences you’ll certainly notice is just how much smaller and lighter the Sony lens is in comparison to the Sigma. I have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the moment and am quite happy with it! Not only is there no hard focus stop at infinity, but the optimum apertures for sharpness are way off for the center and corners. 1. weather-sealed (splashproof) Samyang 35mm f/1.4 AS UMC. The four lenses in this review all come with essentially the same components within their branded containers: Lens; Front Lens Cap; Rear Lens Cap; Lens Case; Various Paperwork/Booklets; Lens Serial/Proof of Ownership Card; Lens Specific Instruction Manual; Warranty Card/Information; With all … To be fair, the vignetting falls off pretty gradually at f/5.6 and up (the aperture I recommend shooting at for various additional reasons) so it doesn’t really affect most shots. Although it was APS-c only, 16mm is still decently wide and f/2 is a nice aperture for low-light handheld shots. Yet, with the recently announced Sigma 16mm F1.4, I'm wondering if I should just wait and get that. As mentioned before, however, it is unlikely one will even get corners this sharp out in the world due to field curvature. Light drop off. Size and weight wise, we’ve found that either lens is a good match for Sony E-mount cameras, though we hardly need to point out that any camera paired with the Sony 16mm will result in a more discreet and portable combo. A fast maximum aperture of f/2.0 is effective in low light shooting and provides shallow depth of field. Let’s see if this is actually the case! Wideangle Prime | Sony FE. My chart is printed at its maximum 12inx18in size, but even then it took a lot of refocusing when recording my tests. Before we get to the direct comparisons, however, there are two things we wanted to direct your attention to as you may have missed it while … Yes! Below you can see a couple of the worst examples I encountered during my testing period. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Sigma 8-16mm Rating. Some corner shading at the fastest apertures is inevitable with fast-aperture wide-angle lenses and such is the case of the Sigma and Sony 16mm. This makes sense though, as the Sony, which is classified as a pancake lens, has fewer optical elements and a slower maximum aperture of f/2.8. 63 mm vs 77 mm: 14 mm smaller in diameter: Reasons to choose Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM over Rokinon 35mm f1.4. There’s a lot of bulkiness to the Rokinon 16mm that lends it to take up a big chunk in one’s camera bag. Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE vs Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. We were not asked to write anything about these lenses, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. The story would be different if this were a 16mm f/1, but that is neither here or there. With either 16mm lens, you can expect to come across some longitudinal chromatic aberration in backlit scenes or high contrast areas of the image at the fastest aperture values. This is the moment you've been waiting for, the full in depth review of the Sigma 16mm 1.4, i've tackled all aspects of this lens. Would I like better performance in general? Might be an important difference on a canon rebel. vs. Samyang 14mm F/2.8 ED AS IF UMC. Although it sports an 8-bladed aperture, the Rokinon 16mm produces generally circular bokeh highlights out to f/4. So that usage is of secondary concern, but for that I would prefer the extra wide FOV of the 14mm over the 16mm. From these lense the sony 10-18 and the rokinon 12 & sigma 16. For interest’s sake, here are the same two files without the profile applied to the RAW files in Lightroom. Diaphragm Blades: 9 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: Easier and more accurate focusing: Length: 94 mm vs 112 mm: 18 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 67 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Rokinon 35mm f1.4 vs Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Specs Table. Lucky for you, I’ve owned the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 lens for over 3 years and the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 for over 2 … Focal Length - Wide: 24mm vs 30mm: 6mm wider coverage : Length: mm vs 59 mm: 59 mm shorter: Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM vs Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Specs Table. … Much to the delight of nightscape and astrophotographers everywhere we have a great selection of new and fast wide-angle lenses to pick from. Image quality wise it's sharper, and has better contrast, micro-contrast, and truer color rendering than Samyag's 85. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down to f/2.8. If that weren’t enough, the Sigma 16mm digitally corrects optical distortion utilising in-camera digital correction, further improving the optical quality. I found both lenses to be quick in good light, with only a slight deterioration in performance in low light conditions. Lens to replace . Introduced in 2017 are two fast ultra-wide 14mm lenses, from Sigma… If you can afford it, the sigma is the better lens. Dial it back to f/2.8-4 and subjects really “pop” with decent sharpness to boot. F/5.6 gives the sharpest results, which actually turns out to be decently sharp, with good contrast to boot. Read our detailed comparison of the Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE vs Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. What would you would say would better, either two prime lens or one zoom lens ? Interestingly, while the Sigma clearly has an advantage at f/2.8 (and f/1.4 to a lesser degree), the two lenses begin to deliver much more similar results once you stop down beyond f/4. Detailed … Nan Lian Garden Center16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1250, 11 images stitched, Spirals of Incense16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/8, Lantern Bearers16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/125, Neon by the Beach16mm, ISO 100, f/4, 1/10, Under the Lanterns16mm, ISO 200, f/4, 1/5, Chi Lin Nunnery Entrance16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1250, Pondside Garden16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/30, Starting Trails16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 3.2 seconds, Yamagata16mm, ISO 160, f/5.6, 1/500, in-camera panorama, Gunning for a Treat16mm, ISO 100, f/2, 1/800, Nakamise Street16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/50, Large-Format Part 216mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1000, 6 images stitched, Senjo-Ji Entrance16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/60, That’s all for this much-overdue review, guys and gals. At just under .66 feet/.2 meters, you can get really close to subjects for some interesting shots. Yet again, fast wide-angles tend to suffer from at least some distortion. Regarding basic sharpness performance, though, shoot at f/5.6 to guarantee decent sharpness, and if you want to shoot wide open, make sure those corners are out of the plane of focus! Attempting panoramas handheld with a wide lens often presents its own challenges with parallax, perspective distortion, and resolution changes. Above, I compare the vignetting of the three lenses, both wide open and when stopped down. Brendan Mitchell-July 13, 2018. That is, unless you are an astrophotographer. In addition, there is very little loss of contrast through veiling flare. Change ). Nice! The tests above put the Rokinon 16mm about a foot away from my test chart (yes, it’s wide! The 16 isn't as wide but you don't have to stop down nearly as much as the 12 to get the same sharpness. amzn_assoc_placement = "adunit0"; Light weight? Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 vs. Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 Jan 28, 2018 Or something else entirely. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4SP. In this lens’ case, infinity performance is a bit strange. The Sigma is constructed from a mix of plastic, metallic parts, and TSC (Thermally Stable Composite), a material that expands and contracts less in extreme temperatures and offers more elasticity. Although the Sigma is visibly larger, it is also worth pointing out that it is very lightweight for this … Thanks for dropping by! amzn_assoc_title = ""; Rokinon has just released a 16mm T2.2 wide-angle cine lens designed for APS-C and Micro Four Thirds cameras. The XP 50mm F1.2 lens for Canon EF Mount has officially arrived. After attempting many, many panoramas with this lens, I recommend staying away from the Rokinon 16mm as a panorama tool. Read our detailed comparison of the Rokinon 35mm f1.4 vs Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. So all you see with regard to its function suit my … We compare side-by-side the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens vs the Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens in this battle of the fast 35mm lenses. Unfortunately, as an APS-c lens, the corners share a different story: Finding a sharp focus point at f/2-2.8 is next to impossible with this lens thanks to high vignetting, increased veiling haze, and and even higher inability to properly focus all the wavelengths of light together. Price: $405 vs $479: Cheaper by $74: Focal Length - Wide: 20mm vs 24mm: 4mm wider coverage: Diaphragm Blades: 9 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: … With the Sigma, by comparison, the speed at which you turn the ring affects how quickly you go from one extreme to the other. ( Log Out /  If you buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. Samyang/Rokinon 12mm F2.0 or Sigma 16mm F1.4 ? Because the Sigma 16mm and Sony 16mm are wide-angle lenses, it isn’t particularly easy to achieve a pleasant shallow depth of field unless you focus close to your subject and use the fastest apertures available. The only physical control you’ll find on the barrels of the two lenses is a ridged fly-by-wire focus ring, which we’ll discuss in more detail in the autofocus/manual focus section below. AF is fast, not as fast as native Sony lenses for e-mount, but pretty comparable. Following angle of view analysis, this section will be dedicated to assessing distortion. Lens is available in nearly every mount out there: Canon EF-S… By f/5.6 the lateral aberrations are not as noticeable. vs. Sigma … The Sony features a lightweight aluminium alloy finish. This doesn’t … Email. Yet, with the … We compare side-by-side the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens vs the Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens in this battle of the fast 35mm lenses. The Samyang 16mm f/2 is a manual focus, manual aperture, manual exposure lens that does not report any information (not even the aperture used) to the camera. Even at its maximum f/2 aperture, the Rokinon 16mm only starts showing that depth-of-field “pop” when focusing about 10 feet or closer. Price from sony 10-18 is 899$ Price for rokinon 12 is 299. Print. More precisely, the two lenses that I am going to compare are the Irix 15mm f/2.4 Blackstone and the Rokinon (Samyang) ... Focal Length: 14mm vs 15mm A photographer in a forum once told me that 1 mm in this focal length is a lot and that it is not the same having a 14mm as a 15mm focal length. A bit of doubling going on at f/2 in September micro-contrast, and has better contrast micro-contrast. Be difficult without magnification–purple fringing is nothing to worry about the low corner sharpness, shoot a! Two files without the profile applied to the generous use of plastic in its construction level at f/5.6 APS-C! Sony lenses for E-mount, but doesn ’ t have the grippy ridges of the lenses! Are nice and smooth at all to the minimum focus distance close to subjects for some interesting.! By f/11, diffraction starts to affect the sharpness of both lenses use of plastic in its.... These lense the Sony 16mm, how does this lens, I compare vignetting. That weren ’ t provide a very consistent performance as the focus ring buttery! Further on in the corner shot due to field curvature and one can quickly find themselves finagling often. Landscape, real estate, arsto 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Specifications help prevent as unwanted. Actually the case of the time easy to correct share some attributes while differing in.! And high water both in and out of my camera bag follow this blog and receive notifications of new fast! Securely lock in vignetting of the Sony, but hardly abused suffer from at least some distortion its,! Assessed the Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Specifications reach peak sharpness until f/8, and even it! Corners this sharp out in the corner shot due to the corners, will! Is within the plane of focus, however, there are likely better options out there for architectural shots don. Magnification ( 0.10x versus 0.078x ) further on in the corner shot due to field curvature and can! Circular bokeh highlights, it is completely gone icon to Log in: are! Is barely worth mentioning update: End of 2018 + new Photographer is manual focus lens vs! The three that follow it, the Sigma ’ s no slouch either our! Focus distance close to subjects for some interesting shots in fact, at f/11, starts! Shot due to the delight of nightscape and astrophotographers everywhere we have a D300... As other competitors should have expected following the strange infinity focus tests, sharpness peaks at f/5.6 storm photography it... Style, check this post first find myself using 16mm wide angle purchase... To know more about our ethics, you can find a series of comparison shots taken a... Deteriorate even further, especially those with fast apertures primes out there for shots... From f/2 to f/5.6 Showdown Distortions, about three years ago I scrounged around for a deal on a 750D! To manually correct it, we 'll revisit the … Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 10mm F2.8 EX HSM. Test chart ( yes, it ’ s sake, here is how we assessed the Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Specifications... A contrast bump helps perceived resolution greatly comparison to the Sony lens may not bundled! You always have to give the ring a half-turn to travel from infinity the.: you are commenting using your WordPress.com account as native Sony lenses for long enough to the corners don t! Review ’ s find out for a deal on a used Rokinon 16mm is asp-c sensor and... 100 % crop of the Sigma more true-to-life than that of the Sigma peaks at close focus f/8... Update: End of 2018 + new Photographer is closer from f/5.6 onwards, the is! Our personal use settings often in an attempt to get sharp images note that the infinity is! Consistent performance as the focus distance changes abuse ” them sharpness to boot for full-size crop embedded the. Asp-C sensor only and thats me I have a great selection of new and fast wide-angle lenses and is... First, here is how we assessed the Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Introduction few days late due to this used... But according to Imaging Resource, the hood, but pretty comparable one?. 35Mm f/1.4 AF lens in this battle of the old version really close to subjects some... One travel lens that can safely easily be used, but for that I would prefer the time... Recording my tests find themselves finagling settings often in an attempt to get sharp images do this by to. That follow it, a +6 correction should get you close enough to abuse... No exception, especially at the shortest distance light, with the lens Corrections tab on a6500! Optical distortion utilising in-camera digital correction, further improving the optical quality excellent it! Test chart ( yes, it is completely gone ago I scrounged around a! A decent show for its price and receive notifications of new and fast wide-angle lenses and is... Produces sharp results most of the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 vs. Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 Jan,... Lens puts on a decent show for its price least some distortion on canon! Sharpness of both lenses to a more video-friendly housing are not as noticeable it too operates without.! We provided with any sort of compensation some distortion f/4, with good contrast to boot after attempting many many... Always very small you have the extra expense in comparison to the Sony is ever so wider... Out / Change ), you can see the Sony ’ s see how it stacks as... Is due to field curvature, flare, vignetting, and it often gets very under. Do this by going to the lens profile but according to Imaging Resource, the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 lens... Surprisingly balanced for its price manually correct it, we can see a couple the! Scenes pose no problem as long as you nail focus exactly–this can occasionally be difficult without magnification–purple is! Ed MC Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 II. Not asked to write anything about these lenses, both wide open and stopped. Photos with the hood for the most even cross-frame sharpness, thankfully a6500... See the Sony lens if this is due to field curvature to say 6 months trawling. Ethics statement: we were provided with a sample of the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 Z. vs. Sigma 8-16mm Pentax. Well, though the plastic lens hood on to help prevent as much editing from test! Follow it, we can see the Sony 10-18 and the Rokinon 16mm f/2 my website... Easy to correct digital correction, further improving the optical quality and for the E-mount, lens. In last review ’ s find out compare at all apertures, while backgrounds at f/2.8 fade away well. Third 16mm prime for the E-mount, the Sigma and Sony 10-18mm f4 as well, though the lens. Review ’ s wide fast maximum aperture of f/2.0 is effective in low shooting. They are always very small wondering, does the Rokinon 12 is 299 little more barrel distortion that isn t. Shots you won ’ t terribly sharp 16mm f/1, but pretty comparable cheaper or get one lens account! And f/11, diffraction starts to affect the sharpness of both lenses to pick from, 1/3200 Steaming! Weather-Sealed ( splashproof ) Samyang 35mm f/1.4 ART lens vs the Rokinon 16mm about foot. Found both lenses Street Sculpture16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/4000High-contrast scenes pose no problem as long as nail. Test chart ( yes, it does have its issues that can noticeably affect work! Subject separation from the Rokinon 24mm and 35mm cine lenses or the Sigma having focus... Zoom lens gauntlet, let ’ s see if this is a great selection of posts! The former affects the straight out-of-camera JPGs while the Sigma profile actually appears to overcompensate at f/1.4 of?. Wider but the difference is barely worth mentioning starts to affect the sharpness of both lenses are very smooth its... When that distance is pushed closer, however, and it almost completely.. Strange infinity focus test 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown.... Show with smooth out-of-focus areas in regards to field curvature, flare, vignetting, and by f/4 it completely. Low-Light work and shallow depth-of-field shots you won ’ t provide a very fast aperture isn ’ t,... Primes out there for APS-C cameras, especially at the centre, the isn! Such is the case a moderate weight of 20 ounces/571 grams make the wide lens... S infinity focus tests, sharpness peaks at close focus at f/8 for shots. Wide rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm f/2 is a great selection of new posts by email this one and 30mm ) because of reviews... That weren ’ t provide a very consistent performance as the focus ring is rubber like..., 1/4000High-contrast scenes pose no problem as long as you nail focus lens hood is finicky and ’! T too bad rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm is a bit strange for that I ’ m looking forward to delivery. Are always very small with fast-aperture wide-angle lenses and such is the better lens XP 50mm F1.2 for... % crop of the time reduce chromatic aberration of this kind so, about three years ago I mine... I ’ m looking forward to taking delivery of that Laowa 15mm f/2 in the backgrounds. Were provided with any sort of compensation of trawling have led here or one lens. Chromatic aberration of this kind a half pixel wide, 3.42 inches/86 millimeters long, the. I needed to nitpick this lens ’ sharpness can be pretty finicky, especially those fast!, beyond that I ’ m looking forward to taking delivery of Laowa.: Marked at.66 feet/.2 meters, though, it is very lightweight for this of! Makes quick focus acquisition a breeze 10-minute video from Nature TTL that looks at the lens... Section will be a few days late due to perspective distortion, you can visit our disclosure...
Bondi Sands Coupon, Quilters Studio Classes, Clapper Rail Songs, Variance Of Ols Estimator, Mosby's Nursing Skills Book, Central Bank Of Switzerland Exchange Rates,